Health in Your Hands
HomeSCOPEField notesCollaboratorsLeadership Donate
Schistosome eggs glow white against a black background at the edge of a bright circular field of view
← All field notes
SCOPE Field note · Diagnostics

Counting eggs: our prototype traps 85%

May 27, 2025 · 6 min read
Underlit eggs in a water droplet

We’re trying to build a mobile, handheld lab for diagnosing schistosomiasis in a community-led way, one that could let community health workers help control the disease sustainably and affordably. This month, our prototype started doing the thing.

The goal is simple to say: filter parasite eggs out of a urine sample so they can be viewed under a microscope, with a toolkit that’s field-friendly and reusable. Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease that leads to serious complications like bladder cancer, and it mostly affects people who rely on natural freshwater in sub-Saharan Africa. Here are two experiments, two weeks apart.

May 14

Can we count what we catch?

I tried the SchistoFilter v2 (at the time, a slanted-wedge trap newly redesigned by Dr. Cybulski) on S. mansoni eggs suspended in a small volume of water. The device wasn’t fully assembled (only two of the corner tighteners were securely attached); my main goal was a quantitative approach. Can we count the eggs in a water droplet under the microscope, suspend them, filter them, and count how many the device caught?

A 3D-printed prototype with syringes and a binder clip beside a small petri dish
A petri dish of eggs in water droplets, and the prototype assembly.
A gloved finger points at a petri dish on a microscope stage above a tablet showing dozens of eggs
Pipetting a known quantity of eggs inside a single droplet.

I hypothesized that the device would catch 25–50% of the eggs. The results surprised me: it trapped about 75–80%, roughly 37 to 42 of 50 eggs. I was also curious how long cleaning would take between uses: you can disassemble, rinse, and reassemble the device in 1 minute and 40 seconds, with some fumbling and fidgeting.

Microscope view of a cluster of elongated, spined schistosome eggs
The eggs in question, under the microscope.

All the visible eggs sat within a thin strip of the wedge — its “landing strip.” That’s encouraging: it suggests the device works as intended, a slanted, size-based filter that eggs can’t pass through but urine and white blood cells can, on their way to the collection syringe.

Thank you to Anesta Kothari, who had the idea of pipetting the eggs and counting them under the microscope. It lets us keep testing how well each version performs.

What we learned for the next version

•

Leaks

Fluid leaked at the inflow and outflow tracts; a seal was only possible with extra adhesive and a binder clip.

•

Hardware

Four twist-lock corners instead of a binder clip, and better screws for the corner clamps.

•

Field cleaning

Caroline pointed out that pressurized tap water won’t be available in rural clinics, so we should test cleaning with poured fluid.

May 27

Eighty-five percent

Two weeks later: the v5 prototype, with Dr. Cybulski’s freshly printed v2 corner-securing twist pieces, and the in- and out-flow tracts secured with parafilm. We hypothesized that from 64 counted S. mansoni eggs, we could filter more than two-thirds and see them under the microscope. We counted 55 of 64 — 85% trapping efficiency.

75–80%
Trapped on May 14 (37–42 of 50 eggs), partially assembled
85%
Trapped on May 27 (55 of 64 eggs), with the v5 prototype
1:40
Minutes to disassemble, rinse, and reassemble
A clear 3D-printed filter device with a binder clip and Luer fittings, held vertically
v5 with v2 twist locks — still using binder-clip training wheels.
Close-up of the device showing a glass slide over an oval rubber gasket
The thin black line of the seal doesn’t go all the way around the O-ring. Hence the clip… for now.

The key “aha” wasn’t the number. It was realizing we’d built a workflow — for testing the device, sharing results, and spotting what to improve next.

The counting workflow

1

Count

Painstakingly count the eggs in a single 10 µL drop on a petri dish.

2

Dilute

Pipette the drop into a tube and dilute to a 5 mL sample.

3

Check the tip

Look at the pipette tip under the microscope for stragglers, and account for any (this time, none).

4

Filter

Draw the sample through until you feel the “tug” Jim coached us to look for, the sign of a sealed system.

5

Recount

Count the eggs trapped in the device.

A pipette tip viewed under the microscope
Checking the pipette tip so no eggs are left behind.
A golden microscope field with scattered eggs trapped in the device
Eggs trapped by the device after 5 mL of flow-through.

Most intact eggs were trapped earlier than expected (about a third of the way up the staircase), while smaller fragments caught further along in the narrower channels. The leaks aren’t solved, and we’d like to secure the slide without extra hardware. Jim has already sent updated files for v6, which we’ve printed; we’re just waiting on new Luer fittings from McMaster.

Two researchers in a lab give a thumbs up
Thumbs up for eggs trapped.
Two researchers smile in the lab, one holding the prototype in a gloved hand
The excitement is palpable when the device you’ve spent months on is kinda-sorta doing the dang thing.

Thank you to Jon, who found the right screws; Phil, who printed the new pieces; Simon and Caroline, who helped count and filter eggs in Dr. Lee’s lab; and Sabona Simbassa, whose coaching on the microscope made all of it possible. To thank the Lee Lab for putting up with our experimentation shenanigans, we gave them a hand-painted, 3D-printed snail (thank you, Phil, Morgan, and Jon).

A 3D-printed snail with a painted red shell sits on a windowsill overlooking trees
A token of our gratitude for the Lee Lab.
Filed under SCOPE
Focus Diagnostics R&D · Place Houston
From the bench

One count at a time

Every version teaches us something the last one couldn’t. Thank you for funding the iterations.